A focused continuity mandate

Continuity Capital Review

Will the funds be available when they are needed—and can the right person use them?

Review a defined family or business obligation against existing capital, income and access. The answer may be clearer authority or documentation, rather than new funding. No product is presumed.

A broad description is enough for the first conversation. Please leave sensitive documents and other family members’ names out of the enquiry.

  • Personally led
  • Written findings
  • Existing advisers retain their roles
  • No product presumed
Continuity Capital ReviewWorking note 01

Fictional example

A payment during the founder’s absence

Supplier payment
₹12 lakh
Due date
30 November
Funds
The company’s cash forecast covers the payment.
Authority
The alternate signatory’s bank mandate still needs confirmation.

Open · authority awaiting confirmation

Who acts next?
Next step
The finance lead checks the mandate and payment limit with the bank before the due date.
Decision
If a change is needed, the company’s authorised decision-makers approve it. The bank confirms the updated mandate.
Illustrative working note. The amount and date are fictional.

Fees and implementation: Professional fees are agreed before work begins. Later product work is separately scoped and may involve provider-paid commissions; specialist fees may also apply. How the practice is paid.

The connections that matter

Capital exists.
Can it meet the obligation?

  1. PurposeWhat must it support?
  2. AmountHow much is needed?
  3. TimingWhen must it be available?
  4. AccessWho can use it?
  5. ReliabilityWill it hold under pressure?

Choose the right first engagement

Is the capital question already clear?

Focused mandate

Continuity Capital Review

Begin here when the capital, income or estate-funding obligation is defined and can be examined separately: for example, continuing family income, a shareholder settlement or a guarantee.

See the five tests

Broader mandate

Family Continuity Diagnostic

Begin here when ownership, control, succession, family roles, liquidity or documentation remain connected or unresolved.

Explore the Diagnostic

The written scope identifies participants, recipients and responsibilities. Relevant family members, owners and appointed advisers contribute agreed discussions and records. Unresolved differences and decisions requiring authorised approval remain explicit.

Written findings

A written basis for the next decision

The output is a decision record: what is available, what remains uncertain and what needs to happen first.

Continuity Capital Gap Summary

Required capital and income, existing resources and any identified gap, with the assumptions stated.

Asset and Access Map

Relevant resources, ownership, intended recipients, access, control and material limitations.

Priority Decision and Action Sequence

Family decisions, professional confirmations and implementation actions, with responsibilities identified.

The decision view

Illustrative structure of the findings, not a client result.

Obligation
Purpose, amount and timing.
Existing resources
What is available and for which purpose.
Access and control
What is confirmed and what remains unresolved.
Reliability
Assumptions requiring testing or professional confirmation.
Next steps
Decisions, responsibilities and priorities.

Scope, professional fee, timeline and precise output format are confirmed before commencement.

Before you begin

Bring the obligation into focus

01

First conversation

Outline the obligation, intended recipient and timing. Detailed records come later, if required.

02

Agreed review

Agree the resources and access questions to review, participants, recipients, specialist confirmations, fee and timetable.

03

Findings discussion

Review confirmed resources, open questions and the next decision. Existing resources may be sufficient.

Before accepting the scope

Clarify which obligations and entities are included, what assumptions must be tested, the records and participation required, who confirms specialist points, and how changes to the question affect fees or timing.

Where ownership, succession or family-role questions cannot be separated from the obligation, discuss a broader Diagnostic before proceeding.

Participation, consent and differing priorities →

The Continuity Capital Test

Five questions the review must answer

01 · Purpose

What must the capital support?

A defined obligation: family income, debt, business stability, shareholder settlement, equalisation or controlled legacy.

02 · Amount

How much may be required?

Test the requirement and duration against existing resources, liabilities, inflation and relevant professional assumptions.

03 · Timing

When must it become usable?

Distinguish immediate liquidity, transition capital, dependable longer-term income and legacy capital.

04 · Access and control

Who can act?

Establish who can authorise, receive and deploy each resource. Ownership alone is insufficient.

05 · Reliability

Will the source hold under pressure?

Examine dependence on forced sales, borrowing, market conditions, founder involvement, family agreement or unverified documentation.

A 30-, 90- and 180-day stress test may help match obligations to usable resources. Equalisation is considered alongside responsibility, ownership and family intent, rather than assumed to require identical inheritance.

Explore a fictional income-and-guarantee example

Fictional illustration · not advice or a client result

How one defined obligation is tested

A fictional family needs 24 months of dependable spouse income and may need to discharge a business guarantee if the founder cannot act.

  1. Purpose: Support the spouse and protect business continuity during transition.
  2. Amount: Confirm the monthly need, guarantee balance and existing reserves; do not accept an unsupported estimate.
  3. Timing: Identify what must be usable within 30 days and what may become available by 180 days.
  4. Access and control: Document who can authorise, receive and deploy each resource; founder-only access is treated as exposed.
  5. Reliability: Do not count a property sale or unconfirmed facility as dependable capital under transition pressure.

Decision view: Map confirmed resources, access gaps and the remaining shortfall before considering any funding route. If ownership, succession or family-role questions are also unresolved, begin with the broader Diagnostic.

From findings to agreed action

Existing resources may be sufficient. Other findings may require changed access, professional clarification or a separately agreed funding arrangement. Implementation follows review and approval of the direction.

  1. Confirm the purpose. Record the obligation, intended recipient and timing.
  2. Agree responsibilities. Establish what participants, the practice and appointed professionals or providers will do, including confirmations still required.
  3. Agree terms. Identify relevant authorisations, charges, possible provider commissions and applicable disclosures and suitability processes.
  4. Record completion. Within the agreed coordination scope, connect completion evidence, remaining conditions and review triggers to the continuity brief.

Sandeep keeps the requirement, decisions and professional work connected. Appointed professionals advise and execute within their disciplines.

Implementation and remuneration

Diagnosis and architecture fees are paid to Continuity Charter Partners LLP. Any later financial-product implementation is separately agreed and handled through the appropriately authorised person or entity. Separate disclosures, suitability processes and commercial terms apply.

Product-related remuneration may include provider-paid commissions; additional specialist fees may apply. Read how the practice is paid and review its registered activities.

A private starting point

Establish the right first step

A private conversation can clarify whether your circumstances call for a focused Continuity Capital Review or the broader Family Continuity Diagnostic.